Loading tutorials…
Loading tutorials…
Close Opportunities are the canonical deal object. Pipelines (Opportunity Statuses) are how you forecast. Set them up wrong, the weighted pipeline number is fiction. Set them up right, the Monday review is grounded in real data. Here is the discipline.
Who this is forSales leaders and founders running sales on Close who need pipeline reports they can trust. If your forecast misses by 30%+ each quarter or your reps argue about what 'Demo Scheduled' means, this tutorial is the rebuild.
What you'll need
Step 1
In Close, the Lead is the account (company). The Opportunity is the deal. You can have multiple Opportunities per Lead (new business + expansion + renewal).
Lead = the company. Holds company-level data: industry, employee count, ICP tier, Lead Status (Working / Qualified / Bad Fit / Customer).
Contact = the person at the company. Multiple Contacts per Lead. Holds person-level data: job title, phone, email.
Opportunity = the specific deal/revenue commitment. Multiple Opportunities per Lead. Holds deal-level data: Opportunity Status (Demo Booked / Proposal Sent / Won / Lost), Value, Expected Close Date, Confidence %.
Lead Status ≠ Opportunity Status. Lead Status describes the company's relationship to you ("Customer," "Working"). Opportunity Status describes a specific deal's progression ("Demo Booked," "Won").
This separation lets you track a Lead that's a happy Customer (Lead Status = Customer) with an open Expansion Opportunity (Opportunity Status = Proposal Sent). HubSpot/Salesforce do this differently — in Close, the split is cleaner once you learn it.
Step 2
Settings → Statuses → Opportunity Statuses. Each status = a buyer signal, not internal activity. 5-7 active statuses plus Won/Lost.
Settings → Statuses → Opportunity Statuses → New Status.
B2B SaaS pattern that works for most: Discovery Booked → Discovery Completed → Demo Completed → Proposal Sent → Contract Sent → Won / Lost. 5 active statuses plus terminal.
Each status definition should be observable — a thing the buyer did, not a thing the rep is doing. "Negotiating" is rep activity; "Contract Sent" is buyer-visible. Use buyer signals so stuck deals are visible.
Each status has a Type: Active (in progress) or Won / Lost (terminal). Won/Lost statuses auto-roll up to closed-revenue reports.
Document each status definition in a short SOP outside Close. The doc is what new reps read, not the in-app description.
Step 3
Each Opportunity Status has a Confidence % that drives the weighted pipeline forecast. Default values are usually wrong for your motion.
Settings → Statuses → Opportunity Statuses → click each → set Confidence %.
Pull historical close data: of Opportunities that hit Demo Completed, what % closed Won? Of Opportunities that hit Proposal Sent, what %? Use 6-12 months for stability.
Set Confidence to historical reality, not aspiration. Typical B2B SaaS: Discovery Booked 5-10%, Demo Completed 15-25%, Proposal Sent 35-50%, Contract Sent 70-85%.
Without historical data, use industry benchmarks but flag them "to be calibrated in Q2."
Close's weighted pipeline = sum of (Opportunity Value × Confidence %). Wrong Confidence = useless forecast.
Step 4
New Business, Expansion, Renewal each often deserves its own pipeline. Use Pipelines (Close Business plan) or Status Groups to separate.
Close Business plan unlocks multiple Pipelines explicitly. On Professional, use Status Groups (categorize Opportunity Statuses by motion: NB-Discovery, NB-Demo, EXP-Proposal, RENEWAL-Negotiation) — clunkier but functional.
Common splits: New Business (cold-to-first-close), Expansion (existing customer upsell), Renewal (retention), Partner-Sourced (channel deals).
Each pipeline gets its own Statuses + Confidence %. A renewal does not need Discovery; an expansion does not need SDR handoff.
Resist 5+ pipelines. 2-4 is healthy. More = maintenance cost (reports, automation, training) outweighs clarity.
Pipeline filtering: every report and Smart View should filter by Pipeline. Without this, your "deals by stage" report mixes new business with renewal and average close rates become meaningless.
Step 5
Force reps to fill key fields when creating or progressing Opportunities. "Cannot move to Proposal Sent without Champion identified."
Settings → Custom Fields → Opportunities → add fields: Pain Point, Decision Maker Name, Champion, Budget Range, Timeline, Close Reason (on Won/Lost).
Field types: use Dropdown for Decision Maker Role, Champion (Yes/No), Close Reason. Text for free-form pain points.
Make required: Decision Maker Name, Budget Range at the Demo Completed stage (require manually via SOP since Close does not enforce stage-gated requirements natively — train reps + audit weekly).
On Won: require Contract Value, Start Date, Term Length, Hand-off Owner. On Lost: require Lost Reason (dropdown with values: "No budget," "Lost to competitor," "No champion," "No timeline," "Wrong fit").
Lost reasons quarterly review is where you find the biggest improvement leverage. Cannot do it without forcing reps to fill the field.
Step 6
Smart Views for daily rep workflow + Reports for weekly review. Pin to the team dashboard.
Smart View 1 — "My Active Opportunities": Owner = me + Opportunity Status = Active (any). Reps live here.
Smart View 2 — "Closing This Month": Expected Close Date this month + Status = Active. Forecast accuracy starts here.
Smart View 3 — "Stuck Opps (no activity 14d+)": no activity in 14 days + Status = Active. Monthly stuck-deal audit.
Smart View 4 — "High-Value Active": Opportunity Value > $X + Status = Active. Top deals get extra attention in reviews.
Reports → Sales → Pipeline Report: shows total pipeline value, weighted pipeline, deals by status, conversion rates. Pin to team dashboard.
Stage-to-stage conversion rates are the metric most teams ignore. If Demo→Proposal is 30% but Proposal→Won is 85%, leakage is upstream (qualification), not downstream (closing). Fix at the leak.
Step 7
Discipline is what separates real forecasts from theater. Weekly review every Monday, stuck-deal audit first Monday of the month.
Weekly review (60-90 min, Monday morning): walk every Opportunity over $X threshold. Ask: is the Status correct? Has it moved in last 14 days? Is the Expected Close Date realistic? Update or escalate.
Monthly stuck-deal audit: filter "Active + no activity in 30+ days." For each, ask the owner: is this real? If yes, set a concrete next step and date. If no, mark Lost with reason.
Most stuck deals are wishful thinking. Closing them properly improves forecast accuracy 20-40% within a quarter.
Track 3 forecast metrics quarter-over-quarter: forecast accuracy (commit vs actual, target ±15%), pipeline coverage (open pipeline / quota, target 3-4x), average sales cycle (days from Discovery Booked → Won, target trending down).
When these drift, the cadence is slipping — not the people.
Common mistakes
Using one Pipeline for new business + renewal + expansion
What goes wrong: Renewals (95% close rate) and new business (10% close rate) sit in the same pipeline. Average close rate becomes meaningless. Comp calculations break. Reports cannot answer 'how is new business doing?' Forecast misses by 40%/quarter because the mix shifts week to week.
How to avoid: Separate pipelines (or Status Groups) per motion: New Business, Expansion, Renewal. Each gets its own Statuses + Confidence %.
Default Confidence % left at HubSpot-style 20% across the board
What goes wrong: Every Opportunity Status defaults to 20% Confidence. Weighted pipeline shows $500K when historical close from the current mix is closer to $80K. Board predicts revenue that does not materialize. Credibility gap widens every quarter. CRO eventually stops believing the Close pipeline number.
How to avoid: Set Confidence per Status from historical close data. Recalibrate quarterly. Most teams: 5-10% / 15-25% / 35-50% / 70-85% across early/mid/late/final stages.
Activity-based statuses ("Working," "Negotiating") instead of buyer signals
What goes wrong: 'Negotiating' is rep activity. Reps mark deals 'Negotiating' for 5 months. Stuck deals hide. Forecast keeps showing $200K coming. Nobody acknowledges they are dead. Forecast accuracy collapses to a coin flip.
How to avoid: Every Status = observable buyer action. "Discovery Booked," "Demo Completed," "Contract Sent." Internal activity = Task or Field, not a Status.
No Lost Reason captured
What goes wrong: Reps mark Lost with no reason. Quarterly review reveals 200 Lost deals with no insight into why. You cannot tell if you're losing on price, fit, timing, or competitor. The single highest-leverage motion-improvement question is unanswerable.
How to avoid: Required Lost Reason dropdown on every Lost Opportunity. Standardized values: 'No budget,' 'Lost to competitor,' 'No timeline,' 'No champion,' 'Wrong fit.' Quarterly distribution review drives roadmap and positioning.
No stuck-deal audit cadence
What goes wrong: Opportunities sit in Proposal Sent for 9 months at $50K value. Pipeline coverage looks healthy because $3M is showing 'Active.' Actual conversion brutal because half are zombies. Weekly forecast vs actual: -40%.
How to avoid: Monthly: filter Active + no activity in 30+ days. Force disposition — advance with concrete next step, or mark Lost. Calendar recurrence.
Tracking Opportunities at Lead level instead of as separate Opportunity records
What goes wrong: Reps put deal data ('Amount,' 'Stage') as custom fields on the Lead. Works for the first 5 deals. Then a Lead becomes a Customer with an Expansion deal — the Lead's 'Amount' field overwrites. Historical deal data lost. No way to track multiple concurrent deals per account.
How to avoid: Use Opportunity objects for every deal. Lead = account; Opportunity = deal. Multiple Opportunities per Lead is the whole point.
Recap
Done — what's next
How to set up Close CRM from scratch for an outbound-heavy sales team
Read the next tutorial
Hand it off
Pipeline design is the highest-leverage CRM work and the easiest to get wrong because it requires judgment about your motion. A specialist who has built 30+ Close pipelines knows which stages tend to be theater, which Confidence to trust, and how to wire weekly reviews. EverestX Close specialists run $400-1,200/mo at $14-16/hr.
See specialist rates
5-7 active Statuses + Won + Lost (so 7-9 total). Past 9, reps stop reliably distinguishing them and forecast accuracy suffers. If you need more granularity, the answer is usually a second pipeline (Expansion, Renewal) — not more Statuses in the same pipeline.
Yes on the Business plan ($149/user/mo) — explicit multi-Pipeline support. On Professional plan ($109/user/mo), you can simulate multi-pipeline using Status Groups (categorize Statuses by motion) and filter Smart Views / Reports by group. Workable but clunkier than explicit Pipelines.
Close forecasting is simpler than HubSpot's Forecasting tool or Salesforce's. You get weighted pipeline (Sum of Value × Confidence %) by date range. No rep-submitted commit/best-case overlay (you have to build that manually). For teams under 20 reps, the simplicity is a feature. For 50+ reps with sales hierarchy, Salesforce or HubSpot Pro forecasting is more powerful.
Closed-revenue reports include it. The Lead's Lead Status typically auto-updates to Customer (set this via workflow: Settings → Workflows → on Opportunity Won → set Lead Status = Customer). The Opportunity becomes read-only by default to prevent accidental edits. Won deals still appear in historical pipeline views with a 'Won' tag.
Yes via Workflows. Settings → Workflows → New Workflow → trigger on Lead Status change (e.g., 'When Lead Status = Qualified, create Opportunity with default values + assign owner'). Useful for SDR-to-AE handoff: SDR qualifies the Lead, workflow creates the Opportunity for the AE automatically.
Close
Close is built for sales reps who pick up the phone 60+ times a day. It is fast, opinionated, and easy to break in the first month by treating it like HubSpot or Salesforce. Here is the from-scratch sequence that holds up once dial volume ramps.
Close
Most teams use Close Reports as a passive dashboard nobody opens. Wired correctly, Reports + Leaderboards drive 15-25% activity lift in 30 days and turn the Monday review from theater into real coaching. Here is the setup that compounds.
Close
Close Sequences are tighter than HubSpot's and faster to ship than Outreach. They are also the easiest place to burn your sender reputation in week 2 if you copy-paste a template and slam it across 800 leads. Here is the discipline that earns replies.
Close
DIY Close is a great idea — until reps stall at 40 dials/day, Sequences burn the sender domain, and numbers start going spam-likely. This is the honest framework for when the cost of self-managing exceeds the cost of hiring help, and how to tell which side you are on.