Loading tutorials…
Loading tutorials…
The three biggest async video tools have different strengths. Loom is the broad-team default. Vidyard is sales/marketing-deep. Bonjoro is personalized-onboarding-only. Here's the honest comparison to pick the right one.
Who this is forFounders, RevOps, or CX leaders evaluating async video tools. If you're choosing between Loom, Vidyard, and Bonjoro for the first time — or deciding whether to switch — this comparison covers the real tradeoffs.
What you'll need
Step 1
Loom: broad teams, support-heavy, internal comms. Vidyard: marketing-led sales, video landing pages. Bonjoro: high-touch onboarding, customer thank-yous.
Loom — best for: general async video across sales, support, and internal teams. Easy adoption. 5-min install. Strong for teams of 5-200.
Vidyard — best for: marketing-led revenue teams. Strong landing-page features, video forms, deep analytics, CRM-native. Better for >50 person revenue teams with martech stacks.
Bonjoro — best for: personalized customer onboarding, high-touch thank-yous, CSAT-driven workflows. Niche but excellent at its niche. Usually one-feature alongside Loom or Vidyard, not a primary tool.
Order of consideration: start with Loom unless you have a specific Vidyard or Bonjoro reason. Switching costs 4-8 weeks of disruption if you change later.
Step 2
Loom: Free → $12-15 Business → $20+ Enterprise. Vidyard: Free → $20-29 Pro → custom Enterprise. Bonjoro: $25-49 per user, no real free tier.
Loom Free: 25 videos, 5-min cap. Pro: $12/user/mo, unlimited videos. Business: $15/user/mo + Loom AI add-on (~$5/user/mo). Enterprise: custom (~$25-35/user/mo).
Vidyard Free: 1GB storage, basic features. Pro: $20-29/user/mo (Sales or Marketing edition). Plus: $59/user/mo. Enterprise: custom, typically $80-150/user/mo.
Bonjoro Starter: $25/user/mo for 1 user (often founder-only). Business: $35-49/user/mo. No real free tier beyond a 14-day trial.
Total-cost reality check: a 20-rep team running Loom Business + AI = $400/mo. Same team on Vidyard Pro Sales = $580/mo. Same team on Bonjoro Business = $700/mo. Pick by capability, not just price.
Step 3
All three: screen + cam recording. Loom: simplest. Vidyard: most flexible (multiple aspect ratios, branded landing pages). Bonjoro: mobile-first.
Loom recording: desktop + Chrome extension. Up to 4K resolution. Clean UX, fast capture, basic editing (trim, blur, CTAs).
Vidyard recording: desktop + Chrome extension + mobile app. Multi-aspect-ratio (16:9 + 9:16). Built-in teleprompter. Heavier UI than Loom.
Bonjoro recording: mobile-first iOS/Android, with web option. Optimized for one-take personal videos. No screen recording (camera only).
Editing: Loom > Vidyard > Bonjoro for ease. Loom's editor is the cleanest. Vidyard has more advanced features (custom thumbnails, scenes). Bonjoro is intentionally simple — record + send.
Step 4
Vidyard wins on analytics depth + CRM-native. Loom is good enough for most. Bonjoro is intentionally minimal — designed for the relational not analytical use case.
Loom analytics: views, watch %, viewer reactions, per-contact tracking. Good enough for sales + CS dashboards. Limited cohort analysis.
Vidyard analytics: granular event tracking, heatmaps, video forms (capture email at specific watch %), MAP integrations (Marketo, Pardot, Eloqua), custom event tracking via API.
Bonjoro analytics: viewer notification, watch confirmation, CSAT pulse. Designed to know if your video moved the relationship — not to optimize a funnel.
CRM integrations: Loom has clean HubSpot/Salesforce/Outreach/Salesloft/Apollo native integrations. Vidyard has deeper Salesforce (custom objects), Marketo, Pardot, Eloqua. Bonjoro has HubSpot, Salesforce, Intercom, Klaviyo.
For >$10M ARR revenue teams: Vidyard often wins on analytics depth. For <$10M ARR: Loom is usually enough.
Step 5
Vidyard: best-in-class landing pages + forms + video personalization. Loom: basic landing pages, no native forms. Bonjoro: no landing pages.
Vidyard landing pages: custom-branded video pages with CTA, form capture, autoplay, hot-spot CTAs at custom timestamps. Strong for top-funnel marketing video.
Vidyard video personalization: insert dynamic variables (prospect name on whiteboard via overlay) without manual handwriting. Massive for outbound scale.
Loom landing pages: simple share pages with custom logo + color, but limited form capture, no dynamic personalization.
Bonjoro: no landing pages — videos are sent as direct links or embedded in email. Tradeoff for the simplicity.
If your marketing team wants video as a top-funnel asset with form capture, Vidyard is the better choice. If your team mostly uses video for 1:1 outreach, Loom is enough.
Step 6
Sales outreach team of 10: Loom or Vidyard. Marketing-heavy: Vidyard. Customer onboarding gifts: Bonjoro. Support team: Loom.
Scenario 1 — Sales outreach team of 5-20: Loom wins on price + adoption speed. Vidyard wins if you need landing-page-style video destinations.
Scenario 2 — Marketing-led revenue with MAP (Marketo/Pardot): Vidyard wins on MAP integration depth.
Scenario 3 — Customer success / onboarding personalized thank-yous: Bonjoro wins on the relational simplicity. Many CS teams pair Bonjoro for onboarding with Loom for everything else.
Scenario 4 — Internal team comms + async standups: Loom wins on the simplicity + Loom AI for summaries.
Scenario 5 — Customer support replies: Loom wins. Vidyard support workflow exists but is overkill. Bonjoro isn't designed for support.
Scenario 6 — Founder-led B2B sales: Loom for the breadth, Bonjoro for the top-50 strategic accounts (personal touch).
Step 7
Switching tools after 2 years = 4-8 weeks of disruption + content migration. Cost of switching usually $5K-15K. Pick deliberately upfront.
Switching costs are real: video URLs change (broken links in old emails), library reorganization, team retraining, integration reconfiguration.
Loom → Vidyard migration: typical 6-8 weeks for a 50-person team. Loom's API can export videos, but Vidyard requires re-upload + re-tagging. Cost: $5K-15K in time + lost productivity.
Vidyard → Loom migration: similar cost. Loom's library structure is simpler than Vidyard's, so usually faster.
Bonjoro is rarely a primary tool, so migrating to/from it is lower-cost — typically <2 weeks.
The lesson: pick deliberately upfront. The biggest mistake is picking based on a 2-week trial that doesn't reveal long-term needs.
Common mistakes
Picking Vidyard for a 10-person sales team
What goes wrong: Vidyard's marketing-grade features go unused. Per-seat cost is 1.5-2x Loom for capabilities your team won't touch. $3-5K/yr wasted.
How to avoid: Start with Loom unless you have a specific Vidyard-only need (MAP integration, landing pages with form capture). Re-evaluate at 25+ revenue reps.
Picking Loom when you need landing-page video
What goes wrong: Marketing builds landing pages elsewhere; sales records video in Loom; nobody connects the two. Conversion attribution breaks. Loom feels insufficient.
How to avoid: If video-as-marketing-asset with form capture is a primary use case, choose Vidyard or pair Loom with Wistia for landing pages.
Trying to use Bonjoro as a primary video tool
What goes wrong: Bonjoro is purpose-built for personalized one-take videos. Trying to use it for screen recording or async standups frustrates the team.
How to avoid: Use Bonjoro for what it's great at — top 50 customer thank-yous, onboarding personal touches. Pair with Loom for everything else.
Evaluating on price alone
What goes wrong: Picking Loom Free for a 20-person team because it's free. Hitting the 25-video cap in week 3. Re-evaluating with switching costs already starting to accumulate.
How to avoid: Evaluate on capability fit + total cost. Loom Business at $15/user/mo for 20 people is $3,600/year — far less than the cost of switching tools later.
Evaluating on a 2-week trial without testing real workflows
What goes wrong: Tool feels great in a trial. 6 months in, you discover the integration doesn't actually log to HubSpot the way you need, or the analytics don't roll up to leadership. Stuck or switching.
How to avoid: Trial with real workflows: 1 full sequence with the CRM integration, 1 full support workflow with the helpdesk integration, 1 marketing landing page. Test what you'll actually do.
Not factoring in adoption curve
What goes wrong: Vidyard has more features but a steeper learning curve. Adoption stalls at 30% on a sales team that finds it overwhelming. ROI evaporates.
How to avoid: Pick the tool with the fastest learning curve for your team's skill level. Loom adopts in 1 day; Vidyard often takes 2-4 weeks. If your team is technical, Vidyard depth pays off. If not, Loom's simplicity wins.
Recap
Done — what's next
How to set up a Loom account for async video work
Read the next tutorial
Hand it off
Evaluating tools is a half-day exercise. Implementing the right one — integration setup, team training, ongoing maintenance — is months of work. A vetted video editor on EverestX can audit your stack, recommend the right tool, and own the implementation from $14-16/hr — typically $600-1,500/mo for a 30-day implementation sprint.
See video editor rates
Technically yes, but it splits your library and creates confusion. Reps don't know which to use for which case. Picking one workspace-wide tool and using it consistently produces better outcomes. If you need both (e.g., Loom for sales async, Vidyard for marketing landing pages), be deliberate about which tool serves which use case.
For marketing-led revenue teams >$10M ARR with deep MAP/CRM workflows: yes. The landing-page features, dynamic personalization, and Salesforce custom-object depth deliver ROI at scale. For <$10M ARR or sales-led teams: usually no — Loom delivers 80% of the value at 60% of the cost.
Bonjoro's value isn't the recording — it's the workflow: automated triggers (new customer, hit milestone, completed onboarding step) that prompt you to record. The mobile-first UX is optimized for the 'send a 30-second video right now' moment. Worth it for CS teams with high-LTV customers and clear relational milestones.
Depends on your CRM: Salesforce-heavy + Marketo/Pardot → Vidyard. HubSpot-heavy → Loom is excellent. Pipedrive + Klaviyo → Bonjoro has good integrations there. Outreach/Salesloft → Loom is native. The 'best' integration is the one that matches your CRM's native architecture, not the one with the most features on paper.
Partially. All three tools have API export of videos (MP4 files). What doesn't migrate: view tracking history, contact-link data, CRM activity history. Plan a 6-8 week migration window for a 50-person team. The biggest cost is broken links in old emails — you'll need to manually update active sequences.
Loom
Loom is the easiest async-video tool to install — and the easiest to misconfigure if you skip the workspace + defaults step. This walks through the full first-time setup so you don't end up with 200 untitled videos scattered across 6 personal accounts.
Loom
Most reps record Looms that look like screenshares from 2018. The reps closing 2-3× more in async video did the same setup work — backdrop, CTA card, thumbnail strategy, CRM logging. Here's the full sales-outreach configuration.
Loom
Most teams hit the DIY Loom ceiling at 100-200 videos. Quality plateaus, library decays, and the founder/team lead stops being able to maintain it. Here's the honest framework for when to bring in a video editor — and what the role actually does.
Descript
Three editors dominate 2026 content production. Descript wins for talking-head + transcript-based work. Premiere wins for cinematic + complex VFX. CapCut wins for social-first short-form. Here's the honest comparison.