Loading tutorials…
Loading tutorials…
Most Loom workspaces hit 200 videos and become unsearchable. Then 500 and become abandoned. The teams whose libraries stay alive at 1,000+ videos did the structural work upfront. Here's that work.
Who this is forWorkspace admins on teams of 10+ people who already use Loom and feel the library getting unwieldy. If you're searching 'demo' and getting 80 results, this fixes it.
What you'll need
Step 1
Workspace → Library → list view. Count videos, count folders, count untitled videos. Decide what to keep, what to archive, what to delete.
Open the Loom workspace library in list view (not grid).
Note key metrics: total videos, total folders, % with custom titles (vs "Recording - 26 May"), % with views in the last 90 days.
Healthy baseline: <20% untitled, >40% recently viewed. Most undisciplined workspaces are at 60% untitled and <15% recently viewed.
Decide a sunsetting policy: any video with 0 views in 12 months → archive. Any with 0 views in 24 months → delete (after one round of owner notification).
Bulk-select all "Recording - [date]" titled videos. These are usually one-off recordings nobody named. Move to a "Triage" folder for the library owner to review and either rename or delete.
Step 2
Top-level by function. Subfolders by use case. Max 3 levels deep — beyond that, search beats folders.
Top-level folders by function/department, 4-8 max:
— `01 — Sales` (subfolders: Cold Outreach, Demos, Recaps, Proposals)
— `02 — Customer Support` (subfolders: Onboarding, Billing, Integrations, Troubleshooting)
— `03 — Marketing` (subfolders: Brand Videos, Social Cuts, Webinar Highlights)
— `04 — Engineering & Product` (subfolders: Demos, Bug Reports, Architecture)
— `05 — People & Ops` (subfolders: Hiring, Onboarding, Internal Updates)
— `06 — Library Templates` (read-only, starter videos new hires clone)
— `07 — Archive` (everything older than 12 months with no recent views)
Subfolders only 1 level deep. 3rd-level folders make videos invisible — at that point, tags + search work better.
2-digit prefixes (01, 02) for stable alphabetical sort.
Step 3
Sales folder: sales team edit, others view. Library Templates: read-only for most, edit for video editor + admins. Archive: view-only.
Per-folder permissions matter: sales videos with pricing details shouldn't be viewable to all 80 employees by default.
Folder → Share → set who can: View only, Comment, Edit, Manage.
Sales folder: edit access for sales team, view for marketing, hidden from external/freelancers.
Customer Support folder: edit for support team, view for product/eng (they reference support trends).
Marketing folder: edit for marketing, view for sales (so sales can share marketing-approved content).
Library Templates: view for everyone, edit for 2-3 admins. This is your "official answer" library; protect it.
Archive: view for the original owners, hidden from new members. Stops people from accidentally sharing outdated content.
Step 4
Format: `[Category] — [Audience] — [Topic]`. Example: `Demo — Mid-Market — Salesforce integration`. Sortable, scannable, searchable.
Pick ONE naming pattern and document it. Everyone follows it.
Recommended: `[Type] — [Audience/Persona] — [Specific topic]`. Examples:
— `Demo — Enterprise — Salesforce integration walkthrough`
— `Support — All — How to export reports`
— `Cold — VP Marketing — [Prospect Co]`
— `Onboarding — Engineer — Day 1 setup`
Why this format works: alphabetical sort groups by type, then by audience. Search by audience or topic surfaces relevant results instantly.
Pin the convention as a workspace announcement and in the team channel. Re-share monthly until it becomes muscle memory.
Tip: Loom AI auto-title can be configured (per workspace settings) to follow a custom template. Workspace → AI → Title format.
Step 5
Bulk-move from "My Videos" to the right folders. Use multi-select. Don't rename everything — focus on high-traffic videos first.
Library → list view → multi-select with shift-click → drag to folder, or use the Move action.
Migration priority: (1) top 50 most-viewed videos (these are your evergreens), (2) videos created in the last 90 days, (3) everything else gets a triage pass.
Don't try to migrate 1,000 videos in one session. Allot 2 hours/week for 3-4 weeks; expect to migrate 200-300 per session.
For videos you can't classify in <30 seconds: drop in `00 — Triage` and revisit weekly. Don't let unclassifiable videos block the migration.
Update the title on the top 50 most-viewed videos to match the new naming convention. The long tail can stay as-is — most won't be searched.
After migration: audit views. If a folder gets <5 views/week from anyone outside its owner team, it might be redundant; consider merging.
Step 6
Weekly: triage new uploads. Monthly: spot-check folder health. Quarterly: archive low-view content. Annually: full library audit.
Weekly (15 min): library owner reviews "00 — Triage" folder + recent uploads. Move misfiled, rename mis-named, flag stale.
Monthly (30 min): pull library analytics. Identify folders with growth (good — invest in templates) and folders with decay (poll the owning team — do they still need them?).
Quarterly (60 min): archive any video with 0 views in 12 months. Move to `07 — Archive`. Send creators a notification 7 days before archiving.
Annually (3-4 hr): full audit. Review folder structure for fit, retire empty folders, promote subfolders that grew into top-level, restructure for new team functions.
Library owner role: assign explicitly. This person owns library health metrics — % well-named, % recently viewed, % archived. Make it part of their job description, not "extra."
Step 7
One-page guide. 15-min onboarding for new hires. Monthly Slack reminder. Public recognition for clean uploaders, gentle nudges for messy ones.
Document the system in a single Loom-or-Notion page: folders, naming, lifecycle, who to ask. Pin it.
For every new hire: 15-min walkthrough on day 1 covering library use. Have them upload one test video using the convention.
Monthly Slack reminder in the team channel: "Library health check — here are 3 new templates, here are 5 untitled videos that need names." Public + light.
For consistent offenders: 1:1 nudge from the owner. Not punitive — most people just need a reminder.
Recognize good behavior: "Top contributors this month" shoutout in the team channel. Library health becomes a status game in a healthy way.
Common mistakes
Over-foldering at 3+ levels deep
What goes wrong: Sales → Demos → Enterprise → Salesforce → 2026 = videos invisible. Nobody clicks 5 levels deep. They search, fail, and re-record duplicates.
How to avoid: Max 2 levels: top-level function + 1 subfolder. Beyond that, use tags and the search bar. Loom search is fast once content is properly titled.
No naming convention
What goes wrong: Same video titled 'Demo for Acme' by one rep, 'Acme - demo recording' by another, 'Recording 2026-04-12' by a third. Search is broken. Duplicate-detection impossible.
How to avoid: Adopt `[Type] — [Audience] — [Topic]` pattern. Document, pin, reinforce. Use Loom AI auto-title with a custom template to enforce.
No archive lifecycle
What goes wrong: Library balloons to 2,000+ videos, 70% of which haven't been viewed in 12+ months. Search results bury current content under historical noise.
How to avoid: Quarterly archive: 0 views in 12 months → archive. 0 views in 24 months → delete (with owner notification). Run it religiously.
No library owner
What goes wrong: Maintenance is everyone's job and therefore nobody's job. The library decays back to chaos within 6 months of the initial cleanup.
How to avoid: Assign one person. Make library health part of their formal responsibilities. Budget 3-4 hours/month for the role. Without an owner, this all reverts.
Permissions wide open
What goes wrong: Sales demos with pricing visible to all 80 employees. Pre-launch product walkthroughs accessible to contractors. Compliance/IP risk grows quietly.
How to avoid: Per-folder permissions. Sales/Product/Customer-data folders are scoped to the relevant teams. Tighten then relax based on real access requests.
No starter templates
What goes wrong: New hires have nothing to copy. They invent their own format, which diverges from team standards. Library drifts toward incoherence.
How to avoid: Build 5-10 starter videos in `06 — Library Templates`: sales intro, demo recap, support reply, onboarding walkthrough. New hires clone the format on day 1.
Recap
Done — what's next
How to set up a Loom account for async video work
Read the next tutorial
Hand it off
Structuring the library once is a 2-hour project. Owning it ongoing — running triage, archiving, training new hires, fielding 'I can't find X' questions — is a real job at scale. A vetted video editor on EverestX can be your library owner part-time at $14-16/hr — typically $400-800/mo for a 20-50 person team.
See video editor rates
More than ~30 top-level folders gets unwieldy. Most healthy workspaces have 4-8 top-level folders, 3-6 subfolders each, totaling 15-40 folders. Beyond that, search beats taxonomy. If you're past 50 folders, restructure.
Loom doesn't offer bulk-rename natively as of 2026. Workarounds: (1) Loom AI can rename videos based on content via the auto-title feature applied retroactively per video — open each, click Rename → AI Suggest. (2) Workspace admins on Enterprise can use the Loom API to bulk-update titles via script.
Recommended: 0 views in 12 months → move to Archive folder (still accessible, just out of main search). 0 views in 24 months → delete after creator notification + 7-day grace period. Keep critical compliance/legal recordings forever via the Legal Hold tag.
Loom doesn't have native duplicate detection. Workaround: sort the library by file size + duration; videos within ~5% on both dimensions are likely duplicates. Loom AI's content-summary feature also surfaces similar videos when you ask 'Show me videos like this.'
Not directly. Loom workspaces are isolated. Workarounds for multi-brand or holding-company structures: (1) one shared workspace with strict folder permissions per brand, (2) move specific videos between workspaces via Share-with-external + Re-upload, (3) Enterprise customers get cross-workspace search.
Loom
Loom is the easiest async-video tool to install — and the easiest to misconfigure if you skip the workspace + defaults step. This walks through the full first-time setup so you don't end up with 200 untitled videos scattered across 6 personal accounts.
Loom
Half your support tickets get answered with a 4-paragraph email that takes 12 minutes. A 90-second Loom answers the same ticket in 3 minutes and the customer actually understands the answer. Here's the support-specific setup.
Loom
Loom AI turns a 10-minute recording into a 4-line summary, 6 chapter markers, and a list of action items in 30 seconds. The features are powerful but only useful when configured for your team's workflow. Here's the full setup.
Loom
Most teams hit the DIY Loom ceiling at 100-200 videos. Quality plateaus, library decays, and the founder/team lead stops being able to maintain it. Here's the honest framework for when to bring in a video editor — and what the role actually does.
Descript
Editing is half the job. Publishing, sharing review links, gathering feedback, and shipping cleanly is the other half. Descript has solid publishing + collaboration features — here's how to use them so projects don't get stuck in 'waiting for feedback' purgatory.