Loading tutorials…
Loading tutorials…
Most teams add 5 competitors, glance at the chart once a month, and never act on it. This walks through the framing that turns competitor tracking into a quarterly strategic input — not a feel-good comparison.
Who this is forMarketing leads who need to benchmark against direct competitors and adjacent-category leaders. Especially relevant if leadership keeps asking 'how are we doing vs [competitor]?' and you don't have a clean answer.
What you'll need
Step 1
Direct competitors (same buyer, same offer), aspirational competitors (where you want to be in 2 years), and adjacent (different category, similar audience). Pick 3-4 per bucket — not 30 random brands.
Direct competitors: brands the buyer would consider in the same purchase decision. Track for tactical lessons (campaigns, formats that work).
Aspirational competitors: brands 1-2 tiers ahead of you in scale. Track for what good looks like at the next stage of growth.
Adjacent competitors: different category but same audience or aesthetic. Track for creative inspiration (you can borrow what works in their category before your direct competitors do).
Pick 3-4 per bucket. Total list = 9-12 competitors. More than this and analysis becomes pattern-matching noise.
Step 2
Analytics → Competitors → Add. Per channel. Each channel has its own competitor list.
Analytics → Competitors → Add competitor.
Enter the competitor handle (Instagram username, TikTok handle, etc.).
Metricool will start fetching public data — followers, post frequency, top posts, engagement rates.
For each channel, add the competitor list separately. A competitor might be aggressive on Instagram but absent on LinkedIn — track per-channel reality, not assumed presence.
Plan limits: Starter usually allows 3-5 competitors per channel; Advanced unlocks more. Check your plan.
Step 3
Pick 3-5 metrics to compare against, not all of them. Follower growth rate, engagement rate, post frequency, and top-performing post type are usually the right set.
Analytics → Competitors → Benchmark settings.
Pick metrics: follower growth (relative to size), engagement rate, posting frequency, top format (video vs image vs carousel).
Skip vanity comparisons (absolute follower count) — a 100K brand vs a 1M brand on absolute followers is meaningless; on growth rate it's instructive.
Date range: rolling 90 days is the sweet spot. 30 days is too noisy, 12 months hides recent strategy shifts.
Step 4
Metricool surfaces top posts per competitor. Spend 15 min/week reviewing what their best content looks like — that's where most insight lives.
Per competitor, click into Top Posts (last 30 days).
For each top post, note: format, topic, hook, caption length, CTA. Build a recurring pattern register.
After 6-8 weeks, you'll see patterns — "their educational carousels always outperform their promotional reels." That insight matters.
Don't copy posts directly. Borrow patterns, not content.
Step 5
Every quarter, write a 1-page summary: what competitors did, what worked for them, what we should test.
End of each quarter, pull competitor analytics for the past 90 days.
Write a 1-pager covering: (a) Top 3 things competitors did differently this quarter, (b) Top 3 patterns that worked for them, (c) Top 3 experiments we'll run next quarter as a response.
Share with leadership. This is the deliverable that turns Metricool from a tool into a strategic input.
Most teams never write this. If yours does, you'll be ahead of every competitor that just looks at charts.
Step 6
If a competitor suddenly grows by 30% or posts a viral piece, you want to know within 48 hours — not at end of quarter.
Settings → Alerts → Competitor anomaly.
Set thresholds: follower growth >X%, single post engagement >Y standard deviations above their normal.
Notification goes to email or Slack (if integrated).
When an alert fires, investigate within 24 hours. What did they do? Is it a campaign launch, a viral post, an influencer collaboration?
Most alerts are noise — but the 1-in-10 that's a real strategy shift is where competitive intelligence pays off.
Common mistakes
Tracking 30 competitors and analyzing none
What goes wrong: You feel productive, you generate big charts, you make zero decisions. Reporting becomes theater.
How to avoid: 9-12 competitors max. Categorize them. Review weekly at a per-competitor level — not just at the aggregate.
Comparing absolute numbers across size tiers
What goes wrong: Reports show you at 10% of competitor's followers. Leadership panics. The competitor has been around for 8 years. The comparison is meaningless.
How to avoid: Always compare growth rate, engagement rate, and pattern-of-content — not absolute counts.
No quarterly synthesis
What goes wrong: Three months of competitor tracking yields zero decisions. You've paid the analyst tax without the strategy benefit.
How to avoid: Write the 1-page quarterly competitor playbook. Even if rough, the act of writing forces synthesis.
Treating competitor content as a copy template
What goes wrong: You replicate a competitor's viral post 1:1. Their audience saw the original; your audience now sees an echo. Authenticity hit, engagement low.
How to avoid: Borrow patterns (educational carousel, format, length). Don't borrow content.
Recap
Done — what's next
How to set up Metricool analytics and automated reports
Read the next tutorial
Hand it off
Tracking is the easy half. Turning competitor data into a quarterly experiment plan is the hard half. EverestX social media managers do both — typically $400-1,200/mo.
See ongoing management rates
Review the list every quarter. Add competitors that have entered your space; remove ones that have pivoted away. Keep total at 9-12.
Not directly. Metricool tracks organic competitor activity. For ad-level intelligence, supplement with Meta Ads Library or AdSpy.
Skip them. Private accounts don't return public data. Replace with another competitor in the same category whose account is public.
Yes — but the synthesis, not the raw data. Raw competitor data leads to copying; synthesis leads to differentiated experiments.
Metricool
Most teams treat Metricool reports like an afterthought — then panic at month-end pulling numbers by hand. This walks through the automated report setup that takes the manual work to zero.
Metricool
Hashtags are dead is the lazy take. The real story: hashtag relevance decays every 6-8 weeks, and most teams keep using the same 30 forever. This walks through Metricool's tracking to keep your tags fresh.
Metricool
DIY social media management is great — until it isn't. This is the honest framework: when the cost of self-managing exceeds the cost of hiring, and how to tell which side you're on.