Loading tutorials…
Loading tutorials…
All three are credible GA4 alternatives — privacy-first, no cookies, lightweight scripts. The right one depends on your feature needs, where your team operates, and how aggressively you need to optimize on price. This walks through the honest tradeoffs.
Who this is forFounders, marketing leads, and CTOs picking between the three big privacy-first analytics tools. Or current Plausible / Fathom / Simple Analytics users wondering if a competitor would be a better fit. Or owners switching from GA4 and looking at the privacy-friendly options.
What you'll need
Step 1
All three are pageview-priced. Plausible Growth starts at $9/mo. Fathom starts at $14/mo. Simple Analytics starts at $9/mo. Same ballpark, different curves.
Plausible Growth: $9/mo at 10K pageviews+events combined. Custom events count as billable.
Plausible Business: $19/mo at 10K, $29/mo at 100K. Adds funnels, custom properties, revenue tracking.
Fathom: $14/mo at 100K pageviews. Then scales — $29/mo at 250K, $44/mo at 500K, $89/mo at 1M, $144/mo at 2M, $214/mo at 5M.
Simple Analytics: $9/mo at 100K pageviews. $19/mo at 1M. $59/mo at 5M. Custom events on bottom tier limited.
At very small scale (under 10K pageviews), Plausible Growth and Simple Analytics tie at $9/mo. Fathom is more expensive entry but includes more in the base tier.
At medium scale (100K-1M pageviews), Simple Analytics is often cheapest but has the thinnest feature set. Fathom is mid. Plausible scales fastest but has the deepest feature set on Business plan.
At larger scale (5M+ pageviews), all three converge to ~$200-300/mo. Pick by features, not price.
Step 2
Plausible has the deepest feature set on Business plan (funnels, custom props, revenue). Fathom is more polished UX. Simple Analytics is the most minimalist.
Plausible Business: funnels, custom properties, revenue goals, multiple teams, SSO (Enterprise), shared links, email reports, comprehensive Stats API. Deepest feature set.
Fathom: pageview-focused, simpler than Plausible. Has goals and basic event tracking but no funnels and no custom properties in the same depth. Strong UX polish. Email reports + shared dashboards built-in.
Simple Analytics: most minimalist. Pageviews + simple events + minimal dashboards. No funnels, limited custom properties. Trade-off: easiest to use, weakest analytical depth.
For a typical SaaS that needs trial-to-paid funnel + plan-tier segmentation, Plausible Business is the only tool with all the features built-in. Fathom and Simple Analytics would require manual workarounds.
For a typical content site that only cares about 'what's our top-traffic article and where is traffic coming from,' all three deliver equally well — pick by price and UX preference.
Step 3
Plausible: EU Cloud (Germany) + US Cloud. Fathom: Canada + EU servers. Simple Analytics: EU (Netherlands). All three are no-cookie + GDPR-compliant.
Plausible: data stored in Germany (EU Cloud) or USA (US Cloud) — you pick at signup. EU Cloud is the privacy-default.
Fathom: data stored in Canada or EU (Frankfurt). Canada has the EU-equivalent GDPR adequacy decision so it satisfies most EU residency requirements.
Simple Analytics: data stored in the Netherlands. EU-only — there is no US data option.
For EU-only data residency requirements, all three work. Plausible EU Cloud, Fathom EU, or Simple Analytics by default.
For US-only data residency (rare, sometimes contractual), only Plausible US Cloud works of these three.
All three: no cookies, no PII, GDPR-compliant by default, DPAs available, no cookie banner required if they are your only tracker.
Step 4
Plausible has the most distinctive UI. Fathom is the most polished. Simple Analytics is the most minimalist. Pick by taste.
Plausible: distinctive single-page dashboard with the entire site overview at a glance. Highly opinionated layout. Strong on the 'what happened today / this week' question.
Fathom: polished, modern, slightly more 'corporate' feel. More white space, larger numbers. Strong on clean dashboards you'd feel comfortable sharing with stakeholders.
Simple Analytics: aggressively minimalist. Sometimes feels too sparse — fewer breakdowns, less depth in the dashboard. Strong on the 'I just want pageviews and top sources' use case.
All three offer Shared Links / Public Dashboards for client-facing reports. Fathom's feature has been the most polished historically; Plausible is close behind.
Try the free trial of each (all three offer trials) and pick the one you find yourself looking at most naturally.
Step 5
Plausible: 3 goal types (pageview, custom event, revenue) + custom properties. Fathom: goals + basic events, no custom properties. Simple Analytics: limited events on lower tiers.
Plausible's goal system is the deepest: pageview goals (free, reuse existing pageviews), custom event goals (billable), revenue goals (with amount + currency), funnels built from goals.
Fathom goals: similar to Plausible but no revenue tracking and limited event-level custom properties.
Simple Analytics events: present but less polished. Lower tier has limited event count. No funnels.
For an ecommerce site needing revenue tracking by source: Plausible Business is the clear winner. Fathom can do it with workarounds but less cleanly. Simple Analytics is not the right tool for this.
For a content site that just needs to track signup CTAs: all three work equally well.
Step 6
Plausible: best for feature-rich + revenue tracking. Fathom: best for polished dashboards + client reports. Simple Analytics: best for ultra-minimalist + cheapest entry.
**Plausible wins for:** SaaS / ecommerce needing funnels + custom properties + revenue tracking, owners on a budget who need the deepest feature set, teams that want the deepest API access for custom dashboards, anyone migrating from GA4 with conversion-tracking needs.
**Fathom wins for:** content sites + agencies needing polished client dashboards, owners who prioritize UX polish over feature depth, teams that want a "set and forget" tool without configuration overhead, EU-region buyers who want Canada/EU data residency.
**Simple Analytics wins for:** content sites + blogs that only need pageviews + top sources, owners who explicitly want the simplest possible tool, teams that found Plausible/Fathom too feature-rich, EU-only data residency requirement.
If you cannot decide: start with Plausible. The feature set covers all three use cases. If you outgrow Plausible's UX, migrate to Fathom (similar data model). If you want simpler, migrate to Simple Analytics.
Common mistakes
Picking by price without volume math
What goes wrong: You pick Simple Analytics because it is $9/mo at 100K pageviews. Six months in, you realize you need funnels and revenue tracking — features Simple Analytics does not have. You migrate to Plausible Business at $29/mo. Total cost over 12 months including migration time: $1,500+.
How to avoid: Project your feature needs at 12-month volume. If you might need funnels + revenue, start with Plausible Business at the front-loaded $29/mo to avoid the migration. The "savings" on the entry tier rarely justify a tool swap later.
Picking by brand recognition without trial-driving the tool
What goes wrong: You pick Plausible because it has the strongest brand and developer-marketing presence. Six months in, you realize your team prefers Fathom's polished dashboards for client reports. Now you have to migrate or maintain two tools.
How to avoid: All three offer free trials. Use the trial period to drive the tool with real data for 1-2 weeks. Whichever you actually open daily is the right pick.
Picking for features you will never use
What goes wrong: You pick Plausible Business for funnels. You never actually build a funnel. You are paying $29/mo for features you do not use when $9/mo Growth or $9/mo Simple Analytics would have been enough.
How to avoid: Be honest about which features you will use within 90 days. Start on the cheapest tier that covers those features. Upgrade later if needs grow.
Stitching together best-of-breed (mistake)
What goes wrong: You go Plausible + Simple Analytics + Fathom for different sites. Three subscriptions, three logins, three different UXes. Total cost: $30/mo. You spend 20% of analytics time keeping the tools in sync.
How to avoid: Pick ONE tool for analytics across all your sites. Cross-property analysis is more valuable than per-property optimization.
Underestimating switching cost
What goes wrong: You think 'we can always switch later.' Six months in, switching means: reinstalling the snippet on every site, remapping every goal, rebuilding dashboards. Reality: 2-4 weeks of effort if your stack has any depth.
How to avoid: Treat the initial pick as a 12-24 month commitment. Do real evaluation upfront: free trials of all three, a 2-week pilot with real data, run the cost math at projected 12-month volume.
Recap
Done — what's next
How to set up a Plausible Analytics account the right way
Read the next tutorial
Hand it off
This is a 1-2 year tooling decision. Picking wrong costs 2-4 weeks of engineering when you eventually switch. EverestX matches you with a vetted analytics specialist who has shipped on all three platforms — a 1-2 hour consultation, from $14-16/hr, usually pays back in better tool selection alone.
Get a real opinion
It depends on what you need. Plausible has the deepest feature set (funnels, custom properties, revenue tracking) among the privacy-first trio. For SaaS / ecommerce needing conversion tracking, Plausible is usually the right pick. For content sites that just need pageviews + sources, Fathom or Simple Analytics may serve equally well at lower price.
Both tools use script tags + UTM tracking, so the install is symmetric — 1 day of work. Goal/event mapping takes 1-3 days depending on complexity. Historical data does not migrate (no compatibility layer). Plan for a 2-week parallel-run period to validate.
Yes — both scripts can fire on the same site. You will pay both bills. Useful for evaluation periods (run both for 2-4 weeks, compare data, pick the winner). Not recommended as a permanent setup — pick one source of truth.
All three are GDPR-compliant by default (no cookies, no PII, EU data residency available). Simple Analytics defaults to EU-only data storage; Plausible and Fathom let you choose region. For strict EU buyers, Simple Analytics or Plausible EU Cloud are equally compliant.
Plausible is open-source (AGPL) — see tutorial #8 for the self-hosted vs Cloud decision. Fathom is closed-source. Simple Analytics is closed-source. For owners who specifically want to self-host the open-source code, Plausible is the only option of the three.
Cloudflare Web Analytics is free and pageview-only — no goals, no events, no funnels. Good for ultra-simple needs but extremely limited. Vercel Web Analytics is built into Vercel projects, similar simplicity. Both are 'better than GA4 for free' but not in the same league as Plausible/Fathom/Simple Analytics for serious analytics work.
Plausible Analytics
Plausible is the easiest analytics tool to install — which is exactly why owners breeze through setup and lock in choices they later regret. The plan tier, timezone, and shared-link defaults are all hard to fix once data is flowing.
Plausible Analytics
Most GA4 → Plausible migrations fail because owners flip the switch on day 1 and lose historical context. The right pattern is a 30-60 day parallel run: both tools firing, both dashboards monitored, then a clean cutover. This is the playbook.
Plausible Analytics
Plausible is open-source. Self-hosting looks free on paper. It almost never is, once you count engineering time. This walks through the real cost math, the operational burden teams underestimate, and the 3 scenarios where self-hosted actually wins.
Plausible Analytics
DIY Plausible is the right call up to a point. Then it isn't. This is the honest framework: when the cost of self-managing exceeds the cost of hiring, and how to tell which side you're on.